[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140128002707.GA12308@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 01:27:07 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: ip, ipv6: handle gso skbs in forwarding path
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:22:47AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 09:22 +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
>
> > +/* called if GSO skb needs to be fragmented on forward. */
> > +static int ip_forward_finish_gso(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +{
> > + netdev_features_t features = netif_skb_features(skb);
netif_skb_features uses skb->dev for determination of offloading features but
we actually need rt->dst.dev, no?
> > + struct sk_buff *segs;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + segs = skb_gso_segment(skb, features & ~NETIF_F_GSO_MASK);
> > + if (IS_ERR(segs)) {
> > + kfree_skb(skb);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + consume_skb(skb);
> > +
> > + do {
> > + struct sk_buff *nskb = segs->next;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + segs->next = NULL;
> > + err = dst_output(segs);
> > +
> > + if (err && ret == 0)
> > + ret = err;
> > + segs = nskb;
> > + } while (segs);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
>
> Its still unclear if this is the best strategy.
>
> TCP stream not using DF flag are very unlikely to care if we adjust
> their MTU (lowering gso_size) at this point ?
UDP shouldn't be a problem, too.
Greetings,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists