lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:17:12 -0800 From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 1/5] net_sched: act: hide struct tcf_common from API On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:11 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote: > On 01/23/14 17:35, Cong Wang wrote: >> >> Now we can totally hide it from modules. tcf_hash_*() API's >> will operate on struct tc_action, modules don't need to care about >> the details. >> >> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> >> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net> >> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> >> --- > > > Cong, this patch does not compile by itself. I did not try the rest. > For git bisect to work: > Every patch should be compilable standalone and all tests should > pass with every single patch (the later part is my view, the first > is common practise) I knew, and I thought I did compile-test for every patch, seems I missed something during update, or you use a different config to trigger the compile error. > > Since Dave already closed the door - no rush, when you get the > cycles please fix this up. I am hoping to do a quick test run > when you are done. > Yeah, I asked Dave in another thread and decided to wait for the next net-next. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists