[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1390948108.28432.20.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:28:28 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Andre Naujoks <nautsch2@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 3.11+] can: bcm: add skb destructor
On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 21:42 +0100, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> Commit 376c7311bdb6 (net: add a temporary sanity check in skb_orphan())
> leads to a BUG in can_put_echo_skb() when skb_orphan() is executed.
> When skbuffs created automatically in bcm_can_tx() in softirq (netrx, timer)
> and userspace context the precise timing has to be met. A sock wmem accouting
> is pointless for this use case.
>
> This patch introduces an empty skb destructor like in commit 072017b41e49
> (net: sctp: Add rudimentary infrastructure to account for control chunks)
> to make the cyclic transmission of CAN frames work again on real CAN
> netdevices. Virtual CAN interfaces do not need skb_orphan().
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
> index 3fc737b..82af1a5 100644
> --- a/net/can/bcm.c
> +++ b/net/can/bcm.c
> @@ -237,6 +237,11 @@ static const struct file_operations bcm_proc_fops = {
> .release = single_release,
> };
>
> +static void bcm_skb_destructor(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + /* no accounting needed for bcm_can_tx() */
> +}
> +
> /*
> * bcm_can_tx - send the (next) CAN frame to the appropriate CAN interface
> * of the given bcm tx op
> @@ -267,6 +272,7 @@ static void bcm_can_tx(struct bcm_op *op)
> memcpy(skb_put(skb, CFSIZ), cf, CFSIZ);
>
> /* send with loopback */
> + skb->destructor = bcm_skb_destructor;
> skb->dev = dev;
> skb->sk = op->sk;
> can_send(skb, 1);
>
You do not explain why its safe to keep a reference on a socket without
incrementing a refcount.
Instead of understanding the issue, it seems this patch exactly shutup
the useful warning.
If you set skb->sk, then you expect a future reader of skb->sk to be
100% sure the socket did not disappear.
I do not see this explained in the changelog.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists