[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1391047176.4405.43.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:59:36 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
Cc: linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Marc Gauthier <marc@...ence.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] net: ethoc: implement ethtool operations
On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 10:00 +0400, Max Filippov wrote:
> The following methods are implemented:
> - get/set settings;
> - get registers length/registers;
> - get link state (standard implementation);
> - get/set ring parameters;
> - get timestamping info (standard implementation).
[...]
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ethoc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ethoc.c
> [...]
> +static int ethoc_get_settings(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_cmd *cmd)
> +{
> + struct ethoc *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> + struct phy_device *phydev = priv->phy;
> +
> + if (!phydev)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + return phy_ethtool_gset(phydev, cmd);
> +}
> +
> +static int ethoc_set_settings(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_cmd *cmd)
> +{
> + struct ethoc *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> + struct phy_device *phydev = priv->phy;
> +
> + if (!phydev)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + return phy_ethtool_sset(phydev, cmd);
> +}
I think these should return -EOPNOTSUPP in the PHY-less case, just as if
the set_settings pointer was not set.
[...]
> +static void ethoc_get_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
> + struct ethtool_ringparam *ring)
> +{
> + struct ethoc *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> + ring->rx_max_pending = priv->num_bd;
> + ring->rx_mini_max_pending = 0;
> + ring->rx_jumbo_max_pending = 0;
> + ring->tx_max_pending = priv->num_bd;
> +
> + ring->rx_pending = priv->num_rx;
> + ring->rx_mini_pending = 0;
> + ring->rx_jumbo_pending = 0;
> + ring->tx_pending = priv->num_tx;
> +}
> +
> +static int ethoc_set_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
> + struct ethtool_ringparam *ring)
> +{
> + struct ethoc *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> + if (netif_running(dev))
> + return -EBUSY;
This is unhelpful. Most implementations of this operation will restart
the interface if it's running.
> + priv->num_tx = rounddown_pow_of_two(ring->tx_pending);
Range check?
> + priv->num_rx = priv->num_bd - priv->num_tx;
> + if (priv->num_rx > ring->rx_pending)
> + priv->num_rx = ring->rx_pending;
So the RX ring may only ever be shrunk?! Did you mean to compare with
priv->num_bd instead?
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +const struct ethtool_ops ethoc_ethtool_ops = {
static
> + .get_settings = ethoc_get_settings,
> + .set_settings = ethoc_set_settings,
> + .get_regs_len = ethoc_get_regs_len,
> + .get_regs = ethoc_get_regs,
> + .get_link = ethtool_op_get_link,
> + .get_ringparam = ethoc_get_ringparam,
> + .set_ringparam = ethoc_set_ringparam,
> + .get_ts_info = ethtool_op_get_ts_info,
> +};
[...]
--
Ben Hutchings
It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Albert Einstein
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists