netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] [BUG FIXES - 3.10.27] sit: More backports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:42:57 +0100
From:	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
	"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@...g.org>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [BUG FIXES - 3.10.27] sit: More backports

Le 30/01/2014 14:31, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:28:43 +0100
> Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Steve, I think the patch I sent yesterday is the good fix. At the end, it's
>> a backport of Willem's patch. Note that he also ack that patch.
>> The first version you sent (which removes
>> unregister_netdevice_queue(sitn->fb_tunnel_dev, &list)) will introduce a
>> memory leak when the user destroy a netns.
>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> I reverted my patches and applied and tested your patches locally and
> they passed my first line testing. I'm going to have them entered into
> our test suite, after removing our other patches, and see if they solve
> all the bugs that we were tripping over.
>
> I'll let you know when these are finished.
Thank you for testing.


Regards,
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html