netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] can: sja1000: cleanups and new OF property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:50:32 +0100
From:	Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>
To:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@...l.ch>,
	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
CC:	linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] can: sja1000: cleanups and new OF property

On 2014-01-31 14:40, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 01/31/2014 02:34 PM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> (could someone with a SJA1000 on SPARC perform a functional test
>> to see if interrupts are working? it would be great :-)
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> - Dropped patch 1 "can: sja1000: remove unused defines"
>> - Addressed Marc's comments on patch 4 and 6 (now 3 and 5)
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Merge sja1000_of_platform.c into sja1000_platform.c (patch 4)
>>
>> The first part of this series performs serveral small cleanups
>> (patches 1 and 2).
>>
>> Patch 3 merges sja1000_of_platform.c into sja1000_platform.c.
>> Changes are pretty conservatives (mostly copy/paste/move). IRQ
>> is treated differently in the OF and non-OF versions, thus this
>> is where the fused version differs the most.
>>
>> The final part introduces the 'reg-io-width' binding (already used
>> by some other drivers) to perform a similar job as what was done
>> with IORESOURCE_MEM_XXBIT. This is needed on my system to correctly
>> take into account the aliasing of the address bus.
>>
>> All patches were tested using OF boot on my OMAP3 system with a
>> memory-mapped SJA1000. Thus, the non-OF path is not tested, as
>> I do not have a platform data at hand.
>
> Nice, looks good now. I'll give Andreas some time to test on sparc and
> then apply the patches.


I am on it. I will dig up some hardware for this on Monday to test it.

Best regards,
Andreas

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html