[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1391389686-34303-5-git-send-email-jesse@nicira.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 17:08:05 -0800
From: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.com,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 4/5] openvswitch: Fix ovs_flow_free() ovs-lock assert.
From: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
ovs_flow_free() is not called under ovs-lock during packet
execute path (ovs_packet_cmd_execute()). Since packet execute
does not touch flow->mask, there is no need to take that
lock either. So move assert in case where flow->mask is checked.
Found by code inspection.
Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
---
net/openvswitch/flow_table.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
index bd14052..ad0bda0 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
@@ -158,11 +158,12 @@ void ovs_flow_free(struct sw_flow *flow, bool deferred)
if (!flow)
return;
- ASSERT_OVSL();
-
if (flow->mask) {
struct sw_flow_mask *mask = flow->mask;
+ /* ovs-lock is required to protect mask-refcount and
+ * mask list. */
+ ASSERT_OVSL();
BUG_ON(!mask->ref_count);
mask->ref_count--;
--
1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists