[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52EFC6DE.3070603@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 20:42:06 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.com,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/5] openvswitch: Fix ovs_flow_free() ovs-lock assert.
Hello.
On 03-02-2014 5:08, Jesse Gross wrote:
> From: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
> ovs_flow_free() is not called under ovs-lock during packet
> execute path (ovs_packet_cmd_execute()). Since packet execute
> does not touch flow->mask, there is no need to take that
> lock either. So move assert in case where flow->mask is checked.
> Found by code inspection.
> Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
> ---
> net/openvswitch/flow_table.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
> index bd14052..ad0bda0 100644
> --- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
> +++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
> @@ -158,11 +158,12 @@ void ovs_flow_free(struct sw_flow *flow, bool deferred)
> if (!flow)
> return;
>
> - ASSERT_OVSL();
> -
> if (flow->mask) {
> struct sw_flow_mask *mask = flow->mask;
>
> + /* ovs-lock is required to protect mask-refcount and
> + * mask list. */
Networking multi-line comment style is:
/* bla
* bla
*/
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists