netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH] openvswitch: Use net_ratelimit in OVS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEP_g=83oVtSTMmLB7O8g=a3e5ghjHp7Bgs-f4nvgqCvWqE5VQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:41:18 -0800
From:	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dev@...nvswitch.com" <dev@...nvswitch.com>,
	Andy Zhou <azhou@...ira.com>, Ben Pfaff <blp@...ira.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] openvswitch: Use net_ratelimit in OVS_NLERR

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 13:46 -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>> > Perhaps it'd make sense to use net_ratelimit()
>> > instead of printk_once for OVS_NLERR
>>
>> I guess I could see it going either way but I'm not sure I see a
>> strong argument for changing.
>
> pr_<level>_once is a per-site flag.
>
> Some of these messages look as if seeing them
> multiple times could be useful.

OK, I guess it's fine. Can you provide a signed-off-by line?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html