[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1391527464.7871.15.camel@e37108.spectralink.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 15:24:27 +0000
From: Sørensen, Stefan
<Stefan.Sorensen@...ctralink.com>
To: "ben@...adent.org.uk" <ben@...adent.org.uk>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dp83640: Support a configurable number of periodic
outputs
On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 10:53 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Modules parameters are surely easiest (for the developer), but perhaps
> > the time has come for the "right way."
> >
> > Currently there is no interface for configuring the GPIOs used by PHC
> > devices, and last year I was going to add the GPIOs to the igb
> > driver. The conclusion of the discussion was that module parameters
> > are bad for this, but ethtool is good.
> >
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg237692.html
> >
> > [ I did not follow through to come up with an ethtool way of configuring
> > the igb pins. ]
> >
> > Even though it is more work, I think the way forward is to invent a
> > way to let the user configure this kind of thing via ethtool. Would
> > you care to take a stab at this?
>
> It seems to me that this is board configuration, not user configuration,
> so it should be defined in DT or ACPI or whatever.
>
> Are there boards which expose multiple GPIOs for users to plug together
> PPS signals?
I would definitely prefer the DT approach. On all the platforms I have
used, the GPIO configuration has been set in stone by the HW. But there
might be some dev boards or the like that has them configurable.
Stefan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists