[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1402051619240.1312-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 16:23:50 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Mark Lord <mlord@...ox.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
Freddy Xin <freddy@...x.com.tw>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [RFT 1/2] xhci 1.0: Limit arbitrarily-aligned scatter gather.
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 11:58:12AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > The problem is that the ax88179_178a driver submits receive URBs that
> > cross 64k boundaries, and are not aligned (they start at an 0x40 boundary).
> > Receive USB frames can contain multiple ethernet frames, by default they
> > are 20kB (and sit in 24kB of memory).
>
> Perhaps you should add printks when a TRB is split on 64KB boundaries
> and see if the device drops packets around that time?
This seems kind of puzzling.
In theory, any URB that's more than 1 byte long can cross a 64-KB
boundary. I don't understand why this should cause problems for
xhci-hcd. Sure, the transfer has to be split into multiple TDs where
the boundary crossing occurs. But why would that be problematic?
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists