[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140205.162422.857987635200528036.davem@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:24:22 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...hat.com>
To: zoltan.kiss@...rix.com
Cc: ian.campbell@...rix.com, wei.liu2@...rix.com,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jonathan.davies@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] xen-netback: Fix Rx stall due to race condition
From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 19:54:37 +0000
> The recent patch to fix receive side flow control
> (11b57f90257c1d6a91cee720151b69e0c2020cf6: xen-netback: stop vif thread
> spinning if frontend is unresponsive) solved the spinning thread problem,
> however caused an another one. The receive side can stall, if:
> - [THREAD] xenvif_rx_action sets rx_queue_stopped to true
> - [INTERRUPT] interrupt happens, and sets rx_event to true
> - [THREAD] then xenvif_kthread sets rx_event to false
> - [THREAD] rx_work_todo doesn't return true anymore
>
> Also, if interrupt sent but there is still no room in the ring, it take quite a
> long time until xenvif_rx_action realize it. This patch ditch that two variable,
> and rework rx_work_todo. If the thread finds it can't fit more skb's into the
> ring, it saves the last slot estimation into rx_last_skb_slots, otherwise it's
> kept as 0. Then rx_work_todo will check if:
> - there is something to send to the ring (like before)
> - there is space for the topmost packet in the queue
>
> I think that's more natural and optimal thing to test than two bool which are
> set somewhere else.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@...rix.com>
> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists