[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52F396DE.8010306@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:06:22 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DT: net: document Ethernet bindings in one place
Hello.
On 06-02-2014 13:43, Grant Likely wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm afraid that's too late, it has spread very far, so that
>>>>>>>>>>> of_get_phy_mode() handles that property, not "phy-connection-type".
>>>>>>>>>> Uggg, I guess this is a case of a defacto standard then if the kernel
>>>>>>>>>> doesn't even support it.
>>>>>>>>> Maybe I forgot to CC you on patch sent to Grant only, I sent a patch a
>>>>>>>>> while ago for of_get_phy_mode() to look for both "phy-mode" and
>>>>>>>>> "phy-connection-type" since the former has been a Linux invention, but
>>>>>>>>> the latter is ePAPR specified.
>>>>>>>> Here is a link to the actual patch in question, not sure which tree
>>>>>>>> Grant applied it to though:
>>>>>>>> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1311.2/00048.html
>>>>>>> It's not the patch mail, it's Grant's "applied" reply, patch is mangled in
>>>>>>> this reply, and I couldn't follow the thread. Here's the actual patch mail:
>>>>>>> http://marc.info/?l=devicetree&m=138449662807254
>>>>>> Florian, I didn't find this patch in Grant's official tree, so maybe you
>>>>>> should ask him where is the patch already?
>>>>> Sorry, I accidentally dropped it. It will be in the next merge window.
>>>> Already saw it, thanks. Would that it was in 3.14 instead of course, so
>>>> that I could use "phy-connection-type" in my binding...
>>> Is 3.14 broken because of missing the patch? If so I'll get it merged as
>> > a bug fix.
>> No, it's not. I could have used "phy-connection-type" in my binding
>> destined for 3.15 and document it as a preferred property as well.
> You still can. We just need to make sure that your patch is applied on
Patches.
> top of the phy-connection-type patch.
I'm not sure this trick is possible if the patches are merged via the
different trees...
> g.
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists