lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:03:23 -0800 From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: use __GFP_NORETRY for high order allocations Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> writes: > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> > > sock_alloc_send_pskb() & sk_page_frag_refill() > have a loop trying high order allocations to prepare > skb with low number of fragments as this increases performance. > > Problem is that under memory pressure/fragmentation, this can > trigger OOM while the intent was only to try the high order > allocations, then fallback to order-0 allocations. > > We had various reports from unexpected regressions. > > According to David, setting __GFP_NORETRY should be fine, > as the asynchronous compaction is still enabled, and this > will prevent OOM from kicking as in : > > CFSClientEventm invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x42d0, order=3, oom_adj=0, > oom_score_adj=0, oom_score_badness=2 (enabled),memcg_scoring=disabled > CFSClientEventm > > Call Trace: > [<ffffffff8043766c>] dump_header+0xe1/0x23e > [<ffffffff80437a02>] oom_kill_process+0x6a/0x323 > [<ffffffff80438443>] out_of_memory+0x4b3/0x50d > [<ffffffff8043a4a6>] __alloc_pages_may_oom+0xa2/0xc7 > [<ffffffff80236f42>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x1002/0x17f0 > [<ffffffff8024bd23>] alloc_pages_current+0x103/0x2b0 > [<ffffffff8028567f>] sk_page_frag_refill+0x8f/0x160 > [<ffffffff80295fa0>] tcp_sendmsg+0x560/0xee0 > [<ffffffff802a5037>] inet_sendmsg+0x67/0x100 > [<ffffffff80283c9c>] __sock_sendmsg_nosec+0x6c/0x90 > [<ffffffff80283e85>] sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0xf0 > [<ffffffff802847b6>] __sys_sendmsg+0x136/0x430 > [<ffffffff80284ec8>] sys_sendmsg+0x88/0x110 > [<ffffffff80711472>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > Out of Memory: Kill process 2856 (bash) score 9999 or sacrifice child > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com> I have seen similiar order 3 allocation failures as well and reached the same conclusion that __GFP_NORETRY was the solution. Eric > --- > net/core/sock.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c > index 0c127dcdf6a8..5b6a9431b017 100644 > --- a/net/core/sock.c > +++ b/net/core/sock.c > @@ -1775,7 +1775,9 @@ struct sk_buff *sock_alloc_send_pskb(struct sock *sk, unsigned long header_len, > while (order) { > if (npages >= 1 << order) { > page = alloc_pages(sk->sk_allocation | > - __GFP_COMP | __GFP_NOWARN, > + __GFP_COMP | > + __GFP_NOWARN | > + __GFP_NORETRY, > order); > if (page) > goto fill_page; > @@ -1845,7 +1847,7 @@ bool skb_page_frag_refill(unsigned int sz, struct page_frag *pfrag, gfp_t prio) > gfp_t gfp = prio; > > if (order) > - gfp |= __GFP_COMP | __GFP_NOWARN; > + gfp |= __GFP_COMP | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY; > pfrag->page = alloc_pages(gfp, order); > if (likely(pfrag->page)) { > pfrag->offset = 0; > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists