[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201402111512.45678.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:12:45 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: monstr@...str.eu
Cc: "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appana.durga.rao@...inx.com>,
"wg@...ndegger.com" <wg@...ndegger.com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: xilinx CAN controller support.
On Tuesday 11 February 2014, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> The only remaining question is if we should create generic DT binding
> >> for fifo depth. Arnd, Rob: Any opinion about it?
> >> Definitely will be worth to have one generic binding if this is generic feature.
> >> But if this is just specific feature for us then current properties should
> >> be fine.
> >>
> >> In general all these xlnx,XXX properties just reflect all configurable options
> >> which you can setup in design tool which means that provide full hw description
> >> with all variants and they are automatically generated from tools.
> >>
> >> Please let me know what you think.
> >
> > I like:
> >
> > rx-fifo-depth
> > tx-fifo-depth
>
> No problem with that. Let Kedar to fix it according this and he will send v2 with this.
>
Sounds reasonable to me too.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists