| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <52FBC487.6060804@solarflare.com> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:59:19 +0000 From: Shradha Shah <sshah@...arflare.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com> Subject: [PATCH net-next 07/13] sfc: Correct comment about number of TX queues used on EF10 From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> EF10 implements option descriptors to switch TX checksum offload on and off between packets. We could therefore use a single hardware TX queue per kernel TX queue, although we don't yet. Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> Signed-off-by: Shradha Shah <sshah@...arflare.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c index 174a92f..3b39798 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c @@ -172,8 +172,8 @@ static int efx_ef10_probe(struct efx_nic *efx) struct efx_ef10_nic_data *nic_data; int i, rc; - /* We can have one VI for each 8K region. However we need - * multiple TX queues per channel. + /* We can have one VI for each 8K region. However, until we + * use TX option descriptors we need two TX queues per channel. */ efx->max_channels = min_t(unsigned int, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists