netdev - Re: [PATCH] tun: use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52FB066E.1020006@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:28:14 +0800
From:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:	Qin Chuanyu <qinchuanyu@...wei.com>, davem@...emloft.net
CC:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
	KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tun: use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx_ni

On 02/11/2014 10:25 PM, Qin Chuanyu wrote:
> we could xmit directly instead of going through softirq to gain
> throughput and lantency improved.
> test model: VM-Host-Host just do transmit. with vhost thread and nic
> interrupt bind cpu1. netperf do throuhput test and qperf do lantency
> test.
> Host OS: suse11sp3, Guest OS: suse11sp3
>
> latency result(us):
> packet_len 64 256 512 1460
> old(UDP)   44  47  48   66
> new(UDP)   38  41  42   66
>
> old(TCP)   52  55  70  117
> new(TCP)   45  48  61  114
>
> throughput result(Gbit/s):
> packet_len   64   512   1024   1460
> old(UDP)   0.42  2.02   3.75   4.68
> new(UDP)   0.45  2.14   3.77   5.06
>
> TCP due to the latency, client couldn't send packet big enough
> to get benefit from TSO of nic, so the result show it will send
> more packet per sencond but get lower throughput.
>
> Eric mentioned that it would has problem with cgroup, but the patch
> had been sent by Herbert Xu.
> patch_id f845172531fb7410c7fb7780b1a6e51ee6df7d52
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuanyu Qin <qinchuanyu@...wei.com>
> ---

A question: without NAPI weight, could this starve other net devices?
>  drivers/net/tun.c |    4 +++-
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 44c4db8..90b4e58 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -1184,7 +1184,9 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct
> *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
>      skb_probe_transport_header(skb, 0);
>
>      rxhash = skb_get_hash(skb);
> -    netif_rx_ni(skb);
> +    rcu_read_lock_bh();
> +    netif_receive_skb(skb);
> +    rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
>      tun->dev->stats.rx_packets++;
>      tun->dev->stats.rx_bytes += len;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html