[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52FB18B8.4070401@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:46:16 +0800
From: Qin Chuanyu <qinchuanyu@...wei.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tun: use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx_ni
On 2014/2/12 13:28, Jason Wang wrote:
> A question: without NAPI weight, could this starve other net devices?
tap xmit skb use thread context,the poll func of physical nic driver
could be called in softirq context without change.
I had test it by binding vhost thread and physic nic interrupt on the
same vcpu, use netperf xmit udp, test model is VM1-Host1-Host2.
if only VM1 xmit skb, the top show as below :
Cpu1 :0.0%us, 95.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 5.0%si, 0.0%st
then use host2 xmit skb to VM1, the top show as below :
Cpu1 :0.0%us, 41.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 59.0%si, 0.0%st
so I think there is no problem with this change.
>> drivers/net/tun.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
>> index 44c4db8..90b4e58 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
>> @@ -1184,7 +1184,9 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct
>> *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
>> skb_probe_transport_header(skb, 0);
>>
>> rxhash = skb_get_hash(skb);
>> - netif_rx_ni(skb);
>> + rcu_read_lock_bh();
>> + netif_receive_skb(skb);
>> + rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>>
>> tun->dev->stats.rx_packets++;
>> tun->dev->stats.rx_bytes += len;
>
>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists