netdev - Re: Experimental Privacy Functions and TCP SYN Payloads

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52FB5C87.50408@iogearbox.net>
Date:	Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:35:35 +0100
From:	Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>
To:	Quinn Wood <wood.quinn.s@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Experimental Privacy Functions and TCP SYN Payloads

(please cc netdev)

On 02/12/2014 11:25 AM, Quinn Wood wrote:
> If program on host A spoofs the source address of an outgoing IPv4 packet then
> places that address in the first 32 bits of a UDP payload, a program on host B
> that is aware of these behaviors can still reply to the program on host A. [1]
>
> Continuing with this approach the program on host A could encrypt the UDP pay-
> load in a way that the program on host B can decrypt, and effectively reduce
> the ability of others in the wide network to passively determine who host A is
> sending transmissions to while simultaneously ensuring the program on host B
> can respond to the program on host A. [2]
>
> I'm uncertain how to proceed if I want to use TCP for stateful connections.
> The requirement of a handshake before data is handed off to the program means
> this approach won't work out of the box. I'm looking for any insight folks may
> have regarding this.
>
> My original approach to the handshake included setting one of the reserved
> bits in the TCP header to indicate the first 32 bits of the payload were the
> real source address. However this would be reliant on SYN packets containing
> a payload. Does the Linux kernel allow this?
>
> -
>
> [1] Barring any non store-and-forward network behavior like dropping packets
>      with questionable source addresses. Considering recent NTP-related  news
>      this seems to be a not-entirely common activity :)
> [2] This is of course reliant on both programs knowing the proper key for the
>      other.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html