netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/14] Xilinx axi ethernet patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140212.191846.1464564509609498703.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:18:46 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	michal.simek@...inx.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, sthokal@...inx.com,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, monstr@...str.eu, John.Linn@...inx.com,
	anirudh@...inx.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	grant.likely@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/14] Xilinx axi ethernet patches

From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:55:34 +0100

> I have exctracted patches which I have in our
> xilinx git tree which are missing in the mainline.
> 
> The first two patches fix compilation error and
> warnings. Then 5 feature patches
> and the rest is OF cleanup and with kernel-doc
> and checkpatch problems.

You should not combine bug fix and feature patches.

Rather, you should submit bug fixes against the 'net' tree.  Then when
those bug fixes get applied and propagate to the 'net-next' tree you
can submit the feature patches and cleanups against the 'net-next'
tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html