[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140213124434.GA27319@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 07:44:34 -0500
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@...wei.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, vyasevich@...il.com, dborkman@...hat.com,
sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] sctp: optimize the sctp_sysctl_net_register
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:19:25AM +0800, Wang Weidong wrote:
> On 2014/2/12 19:53, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:44:44AM +0800, Wang Weidong wrote:
> >> Here, when the net is init_net, we needn't to kmemdup the ctl_table
> >> again. So add a check for net. Also we can save some memory.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@...wei.com>
> >> ---
> >> net/sctp/sysctl.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/sctp/sysctl.c b/net/sctp/sysctl.c
> >> index d354de5..35c8923 100644
> >> --- a/net/sctp/sysctl.c
> >> +++ b/net/sctp/sysctl.c
> >> @@ -402,15 +402,18 @@ static int proc_sctp_do_rto_max(struct ctl_table *ctl, int write,
> >>
> >> int sctp_sysctl_net_register(struct net *net)
> >> {
> >> - struct ctl_table *table;
> >> - int i;
> >> + struct ctl_table *table = sctp_net_table;
> >> +
> >> + if (!net_eq(net, &init_net)) {
> >> + int i;
> >>
> >> - table = kmemdup(sctp_net_table, sizeof(sctp_net_table), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> - if (!table)
> >> - return -ENOMEM;
> >> + table = kmemdup(sctp_net_table, sizeof(sctp_net_table), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!table)
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>
> >> - for (i = 0; table[i].data; i++)
> >> - table[i].data += (char *)(&net->sctp) - (char *)&init_net.sctp;
> >> + for (i = 0; table[i].data; i++)
> >> + table[i].data += (char *)(&net->sctp) - (char *)&init_net.sctp;
> >> + }
> >>
> > In the first version of this patch you complained about a lockdep issue. Did
> > you figure out what that was, and if it related to these changes?
> >
> > Neil
> >
> >
> Hi Neil,
>
> The lockdep issue doesn't relate to these changes. I should send it
> by the another email. Sorry for confusing you.
>
> Regards
> Wang
>
Then you probably don't need to mention it in the same note that you're
proposing changes.
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists