netdev - Re: ip_set: protocol %u message -- useful?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140213195908.GK25153@breakpoint.cc>
Date:	Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:59:08 +0100
From:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To:	Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu>
Cc:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vitaly Lavrov <lve@...p.ru>
Subject: Re: ip_set: protocol %u message -- useful?

Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu> wrote:
> > Maybe printing "using protocol version X" will make it appear less like
> > a debugging message referring to packet contents or something similar.
> 
> With pr_info it'll still appear in dmesg, and it'll still be "random
> non-sensical message appears over and over in dmesg" type of
> situation, to the vast majority of users. Do we need a print every
> time someone creates a new tcp connection too? I'm still not totally
> clear on the cause of this message getting printed, but I was seeing
> it a whole bunch in my configuration...

Yes, because it erronously got moved into the netns init function.

And thats what causes the spew.  Moving it back into module init
function should be enough.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html