netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: remove unnecessary return's

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402132306020.1967@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date:	Thu, 13 Feb 2014 23:06:55 +0100 (CET)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: remove unnecessary return's

On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Dave Jones wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:55:23PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
>  > The patch below converts label: return; } to label: ; }.  I have only 
>  > scanned through the patches, not patched the code and looked at the 
>  > results, so I am not sure that it is completely correct.  On the other 
>  > hand, I'm also not sure that label: ; } is better than label: return; }, 
>  > either.  If people think it is, then I can cheack the results in more 
>  > detail.
> 
> Why not delete the label, and just replace the goto with a return if
> the label is at the end of the function ?

Good point :)

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html