[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140212.190637.328045386111912135.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:06:37 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: mst@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jasowang@...hat.com,
virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
qinchuanyu@...wei.com, joern@...fs.org, anatol.pomozov@...il.com,
nab@...ux-iscsi.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] kref: add kref_sub_return
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:56:30 -0800
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 06:38:21PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> It is sometimes useful to get the value of the reference count after
>> decrement.
>> For example, vhost wants to execute some periodic cleanup operations
>> once number of references drops below a specific value, before it
>> reaches zero (for efficiency).
>
> You should never care about what the value of the kref is, if you are
> using it correctly :)
It isn't being used to determine when to destroy things.
They use it to as a heuristic of when to trigger polling.
Each ubuf attached gets a kref to the higher level virtio_net buffer
holding object, they want to trigger polling when that reference drops
to 1 or lower.
Right now they are reading the atomic refcount directly, which
I think is much worse than this helper.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists