[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140214094151.GA12549@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:41:51 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: use daddr to get inet_peer
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 05:25:35PM +0800, Duan Jiong wrote:
>
> since commit 1d861aa4("inet: Minimize use of cached route inetpeer"),
> ip_error() uses saddr to get inet_peer, so ip_error() and icmpv4_xrlim_allow()
> use the same inet_peer to limit icmp error message twice.
>
> In ip_error(), peer->rate_tokens is set to ip_rt_error_burst, but in
> inet_peer_xrlim_allow() peer->rate_tokens is set to XRLIM_BURST_FACTOR.
> XRLIM_BURST_FACTOR is defined to 6, so user seting ip_rt_error_burst makes
> no sense.
>
> In my opinion, the ip_rt_error_burst is used to limit icmp error messages
> for daddr instead of saddr.
Hmmm...
ip_error is a dst_input function, as such it gets called with the incoming
packet. saddr is the address we send the reply back (see
icmp_send->icmp_route_lookup).
Sorry, I don't think the patch is correct.
Bye,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists