[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140217151531.GD13038@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:15:31 +0100
From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 11/12] bonding: trivial: rename
slave->jiffies to ->last_link_up
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 03:02:36PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
>> - unsigned long jiffies;
>> + /* all three in jiffies */
>> + unsigned long last_link_up;
>> unsigned long last_arp_rx;
>> unsigned long target_last_arp_rx[BOND_MAX_ARP_TARGETS];
>
>Personally I'd add _time to the member names (maybe not the last
>as that is long enough already).
>I sometimes go as far as adding the time units (eg _ms or _sec)
>just to avoid confusion when reading the code much later on.
Good idea, however current renaming follows the one used in bonding:
last_link_up, last_arp_rx (ripped from net_device, where last_rx is also
used), target_last_arp_rx, slave_last_rx() and some other. So it's somehow
consistent over all bonding and some other networking code (grepping by
last_rx yields a lot of results). And all of these are using jiffies as its
value.
I really like the general idea (to make it more readable, bonding really
lacks this part), however it's, IMO, a new patch(-set) material and doesn't
really fit in this patchset.
If you'd like to do that I would be really glad :), otherwise I'll add this
to my todo list.
Thanks a lot!
>
> David
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists