[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5301AF26.7080102@openwrt.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:41:42 +0100
From: Steven Barth <cyrus@...nwrt.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ipv6: fix inconsistent prefix route handling
Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> This could too easily clean up valid on-link information if the address
> just happens to be in the same subnet. Would (ifp-flags &
> (IFA_F_PERMANENET|IFA_F_TEMPORARY) && !(...)) solve the problem, too?
No, that doesn't do the trick unfortunately. Seems that the
(non-permanent) address created by "ip" don't have IFA_F_TEMPORARY set.
Any other good ideas?
Cheers,
Steven
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists