netdev - Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 01/10] batman-adv: fix soft-interface MTU computation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53030165.2050404@meshcoding.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Feb 2014 07:44:53 +0100
From:	Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...hcoding.com>
To:	The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc
	 Networking <b.a.t.m.a.n@...ts.open-mesh.org>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, mareklindner@...mailbox.ch
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 01/10] batman-adv: fix soft-interface MTU
 computation

On 17/02/14 22:13, David Miller wrote:
> From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...hcoding.com>
> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:48:40 +0100
> 
>> +	atomic_set(&bat_priv->packet_size_max, min_mtu);
> 
> Please fix this.
> 
> The only operations performed on packet_size_max are 'set' and
> 'read'.  This is not what one uses atomic_t's for.
> 
> The use of an atomic_t in this context is a NOP.  You aren't
> getting any kind of synchronization at all.

True. Thanks for the suggestion.
Unfortunately this is not the only "fake-atomic" variable we have.

We'll send a change for this later within our pull request for net-next, ok?


-- 
Antonio Quartulli


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)