[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140221171034.GA2488@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:10:35 -0300
From: Flavio Leitner <fbl@...hat.com>
To: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Deliver skbs to intermediate interfaces, when using cascaded
rx-handlers
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:01:58AM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
> I have a system with the following configuration:
>
> * eth0 is a regular Ethernet MAC, connected to a hardware switch.
> * port[1-4] are the in-kernel representation of the switch.
> * team0 is a regular team-interface which bonds port1 and port2.
>
> +-------+
> | team0 |
> +---+---+
> |
> +----+----+
> | |
> +---+---+ +---+---+ +-------+ +-------+
> | port1 | | port2 | | port3 | | port4 |
> +---+---+ +---+---+ +---+---+ +---+---+
> | | | |
> +---------+----+----+---------+
> |
> +---+---+
> | eth0 |
> +-------+
>
> Both the switch and the team driver attaches rx-handlers to their
> lower layers. The problem is that team expects LACP frames that
> are intercepted by team0, to also be delivered to the port interface
> by __netif_receive_skb_core (in the final iteration of the registered
> protocols). However in this case, when two rx-handlers are cascaded,
> the skb will be delivered to eth0, since that is the original device
> (orig_dev).
Indeed. It is not possible to update orig_dev, so it is stuck
on eth0 regardless of all the stacked interfaces.
> There are a few ways this can be solved as far as i can see:
>
> 1. Introduce a new rx-handler return code that specifies that
> skb->dev has been altered, like RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER, and that we
> also want to change orig_dev to this new device.
But then you need to know which rx-handler will run next, because
the orig_dev might still be implicit wanted.
> 2. Change the switch driver to return RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED and then
> queue the skb all over again, though I am afraid that this will eat
> some cycles.
Before queue again, you need to update skb->dev, right? This seems
similar to (1).
> 3. Keep track of all traversed interfaces and change the final
> protocol iteration to deliver the skb to all intermediate devices.
That's what I thought too.
fbl
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists