[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <309B89C4C689E141A5FF6A0C5FB2118B73159251@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 04:11:28 +0000
From: "Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>,
"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [net-next 3/3] ixgbe: Check config reads for removal
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 10:32 AM
> To: Brown, Aaron F
> Cc: Rustad, Mark D; netdev@...r.kernel.org; gospo@...hat.com;
> sassmann@...hat.com
> Subject: Re: [net-next 3/3] ixgbe: Check config reads for removal
>
> From: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 20:45:21 -0800
>
> > - if (!(IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_STATUS) & IXGBE_STATUS_GIO))
> > + if (!(IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_STATUS) & IXGBE_STATUS_GIO) ||
> > + ixgbe_removed(hw->hw_addr))
> > goto out;
>
> This is not indented correctly, the second line of the if() statement
> should start at the first column after the openning parenthesis of the
> top-level if() statement.
Thanks Dave,
Turns out we noticed another minor issue in this as well, but significant enough to warrant running it through test again, so I'll resubmit the series again once it gets through the process.
>
> > + if (*value == IXGBE_FAILED_READ_CFG_WORD &&
> > + ixgbe_check_cfg_remove(&adapter->hw, parent_dev))
> > + return -1;
>
> Just as you correctly did here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists