[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1393178122.2316.50.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 09:55:22 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Larry Brakmo <brakmo@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: switch rtt estimations to usec resolution
On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 09:36 +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2014, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> >
> > Upcoming congestion controls for TCP require usec resolution for RTT
> > estimations. Millisecond resolution is simply not enough these days.
>
> ...
>
> > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_metrics.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_metrics.c
>
> ...
>
> > @@ -408,10 +395,10 @@ void tcp_update_metrics(struct sock *sk)
> > */
> > if (!tcp_metric_locked(tm, TCP_METRIC_RTT)) {
> > if (m <= 0)
> > - rtt = tp->srtt;
> > + rtt = tp->srtt_us;
> > else
> > rtt -= (m >> 3);
> > - tcp_metric_set_msecs(tm, TCP_METRIC_RTT, rtt);
> > + tcp_metric_set(tm, TCP_METRIC_RTT, rtt);
>
> What is the way to handle this change of
> resolution in TCP_METRICS_ATTR_VALS? The ip tool has
> code in ip/tcp_metrics.c process_msg() that needs to
> know what we get, ms or us. Do we need to add some
> new attribute as flag or version? Or we need to increase
> TCP_METRICS_GENL_VERSION in kernel and to check it in
> process_msg ?
crap... This should have been usec units as we did for tcp_info years
ago.
Solution is to add TCP_METRIC_RTT_US and TCP_METRIC_RTTVAR_US attributes
I'll send a v2
Thanks !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists