netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next v4 2/8] 6lowpan: add uncompress header size function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D0F6CBE9F@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:05:41 +0000
From:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:	'Alexander Aring' <alex.aring@...il.com>
CC:	"alex.bluesman.smirnov@...il.com" <alex.bluesman.smirnov@...il.com>,
	"dbaryshkov@...il.com" <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"linux-zigbee-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
	<linux-zigbee-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"martin.townsend@...lon.com" <martin.townsend@...lon.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v4 2/8] 6lowpan: add uncompress header size
 function

From: Alexander Aring 
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 04:10:05PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > From: Alexander Aring
...
> > > +static inline u8 lowpan_addr_mode_size(const u8 addr_mode)
> > > +{
> > > +	switch (addr_mode) {
> > > +	case LOWPAN_IPHC_ADDR_00:
> > > +		return 16;
> > > +	case LOWPAN_IPHC_ADDR_01:
> > > +		return 8;
> > > +	case LOWPAN_IPHC_ADDR_02:
> > > +		return 2;
> > > +	default:
> > > +		return 0;
> > > +	}
> > > +}
> >
> > The compiler will generate much better code if you index an array instead
> > of using a switch statement.
> >
> >
> 
> You mean something like:
> 
> static inline u8 lowpan_addr_mode_size(const u8 addr_mode)
> {
>         const u8 res[] = { 16, 8, 2, 0 };
>         return res[addr_mode];
> }
> 
> or should I drop the array from the stack and declare it static?

You definitely want the array to be static (as well as const).
You could also use named initialisers.
If I've got the syntax right that would be:

		static const u8 sizes[] = {
			[LOWPAN_IPHC_ADDR_00] = 16,
			[LOWPAN_IPHC_ADDR_01] = 8,
			[LOWPAN_IPHC_ADDR_02] = 2,
		};
		return sizes[addr_mode];

Whether you need a bound check (or the 4th array index) depends on where
the input value comes from.

	David