[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1393439085.407.31.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:24:45 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: 'Alexander Aring' <alex.aring@...il.com>,
"alex.bluesman.smirnov@...il.com" <alex.bluesman.smirnov@...il.com>,
"dbaryshkov@...il.com" <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-zigbee-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<linux-zigbee-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"martin.townsend@...lon.com" <martin.townsend@...lon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/8] 6lowpan: add uncompress header size
function
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 16:10 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Alexander Aring
[]
> > diff --git a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan.h b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan.h
[]
> > +static inline u8 lowpan_addr_mode_size(const u8 addr_mode)
> > +{
> > + switch (addr_mode) {
> > + case LOWPAN_IPHC_ADDR_00:
> > + return 16;
> > + case LOWPAN_IPHC_ADDR_01:
> > + return 8;
> > + case LOWPAN_IPHC_ADDR_02:
> > + return 2;
> > + default:
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +}
>
> The compiler will generate much better code if you index an array instead
> of using a switch statement.
Are you sure of that?
Perhaps the compiler would inline the assignment
anyway if addr_mode is __builtin_constant_p
gcc 4.8 here does the same thing with:
static inline unsigned char f1(unsigned char a)
{
switch (a) {
case 0: return 16;
case 1: return 8;
case 2: return 2;
default: return 0;
}
}
static inline unsigned char f2(unsigned char a)
{
static const unsigned char rtns[] = { 16, 8, 2, 0 };
return rtns[a & 3];
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists