[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <530DEA7C.6010609@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:22:04 +0100
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appana.durga.rao@...inx.com>,
"wg@...ndegger.com" <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] can: xilinx CAN controller support.
On 02/26/2014 02:07 PM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
>> This loop looks broken. Can you explain how it works.
>>
>> What it shoud do is:
>> We have put (priv->tx_head - priv->tx_tail) CAN frames into the FIFO.
>> This means at maximum there could be this amount of CAN frames which
>> have been successfully transmitted. For every cycle in this while loop you
>> should:
>> a) check if a CAN frame has successfully been transmitted
>> (as this CAN core uses a FIFO it should be "oldest")
>> A read_reg() of some kind is missing in your loop.
>> b) if needed, remove this event from the FIFO or
>> mark the interrupt as done. Whatever you hardware needs.
>> c) update your statistics
>> d) Use can_get_echo_skb to push this frame into the networking stack
>> e) As a CAN frame has been transmitted successfully, wake the tx_queue.
>>
>>> + while (priv->tx_head - priv->tx_tail > 0) {
>>> + if (isr & XCAN_IXR_TXFLL_MASK) {
>>> + priv->write_reg(priv, XCAN_ICR_OFFSET,
>>> + XCAN_IXR_TXFLL_MASK);
>>> + netif_stop_queue(ndev);
>>
>> Why do you stop the queue here? A CAN frame has successfully been
>> transmitted, there should be room in the FIFO.
>>
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> + can_get_echo_skb(ndev, priv->tx_tail %
>>> + priv->xcan_echo_skb_max_tx);
>>> + priv->tx_tail++;
>>> + }
>>> +
>
> The below are the bit fields available for the Transmit FIFO.
> 1) In the ISR(interrupt status register) Tx Ok interrupt and Tx fifo full interrupt.
> 2) in the SR(Status Register) Tx fifo full condition.
>
>
> I am modifying the entire tx interrupt logic to like below.
>
> static void xcan_tx_interrupt(struct net_device *ndev, u32 isr)
> {
> struct xcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> struct net_device_stats *stats = &ndev->stats;
>
> while (priv->tx_head - priv->tx_tail > 0) {
> if (isr & XCAN_IXR_TXFLL_MASK) {
> priv->write_reg(priv, XCAN_ICR_OFFSET,
> XCAN_IXR_TXFLL_MASK);
> break;
> }
> can_get_echo_skb(ndev, priv->tx_tail %
> priv->xcan_echo_skb_max_tx);
> priv->tx_tail++;
> stats->tx_packets++;
> netif_wake_queue(ndev);
> can_led_event(ndev, CAN_LED_EVENT_TX);
>
> }
You just need to wake the queue once.
> }
>
>
> Are you Ok with the above logic?
No, how can you tell how many frames have been transmitted?
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (243 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists