netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] xfrm: Correctly parse netlink msg from 32bits ip command on 64bits host

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140227.185220.1897448102119943086.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:52:20 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	fw@...len.de
Cc:	ben@...adent.org.uk, fan.du@...driver.com,
	steffen.klassert@...unet.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xfrm: Correctly parse netlink msg from 32bits
 ip command on 64bits host

From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 20:16:02 +0100

> Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk> wrote:
>> > On 2014年02月20日 17:59, Steffen Klassert wrote:
>> > > For now I think we should just refuse to do anything if someone tries
>> > > to configure ipsec with 32 bit tools on a 64 bit machine.
>> > 
>> > I'm fine with your point, and it would be a good choice to inform user about
>> > this behavior other than just creating non-working SA and SP for user.
> 
> It might be better to try to revive
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/157118/focus=157122
> 
> which adds full compat support.

Agreed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html