[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1393587499.10280.10.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 03:38:19 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
François CACHEREUL <f.cachereul@...halink.fr>,
Zhenjie Chen <zhchen@...hat.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: send arp requests even if there's no
route to them
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 12:28 +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 03:12:51AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> >On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 11:57 +0100, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> ...snip...
> >> + if (bond->params.arp_validate)
> >> + pr_warn("%s: no route to arp_ip_target %pI4 and arp_validate is set\n",
> >> + bond->dev->name, &targets[i]);
> >
> >Maybe
> >
> > if (bond->params.arp_validate && net_ratelimit())
>
> Hm, not that I'm against it - but bond_arp_send_all() is called every
> arp_interval - which is usually >50ms. Does it really make sense to put it
> here?
Dunno, but you're converting a generally not emitted pr_debug
(DEBUG isn't set, so it'd have to be enabled by dynamic_debug)
to something that'll always print out a line for each of up to
16 targets, so it seems it could be pretty noisy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists