[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 00:03:23 +0100
From: Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@....de>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Cc: Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Florian Westphal <fwestpha@...hat.com>,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: bridge is not forwaring ICMP6 neighbor solicitation to KVM guest
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 04:40:40PM -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> I did notice a minor issue in the bridge code. The following
> code:
> /* Prevent flooding this packet if there is no listener present */
> if (!ipv6_addr_is_ll_all_nodes(&ip6h->daddr))
> BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->mrouters_only = 1;
>
> if (ip6h->nexthdr != IPPROTO_HOPOPTS ||
> ip6h->payload_len == 0)
> return 0;
>
> will mark most multicast traffic is mrouters_only. The two
> statement should be probably be reversed. However, that's shouldn't
> cause the reported problem.
Reversing the order of these two if-clauses would reintroduce the issue
this commit tried to address, I think:
"bridge: prevent flooding IPv6 packets that do not have a listener"
Besides, I don't quite see what minor issue you are refering to,
would you mind being a little more verbose?
Cheers, Linus
PS: mrouters_only has a kind of confusing naming... for
MLD/IGMP packets it means sending to multicast routers only, there
the name fits. But for non-MLD/IGMP packets it means something
else since "bridge: Only flood unregistered groups to routers"
(and I went along with it with "bridge: prevent flooding IPv6 packets
that do not have a listener"), there it means dropping the skb if
there is no router or matching listener.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists