| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1393972752.26794.145.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 14:39:12 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: lars.persson@...s.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] tcp: tcp_release_cb() should release socket ownership
On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 13:48 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 06:16:23 -0800
>
> > Could you try following hack/patch ?
>
> Eric, if you do fix it like this (I don't mind), please use mnenomics
> for the various lock state values.
Sure this was kind of a hack...
I was thinking of following patch instead.
Note I would prefer waiting Lars tests.
Thanks !
[PATCH] tcp: tcp_release_cb() should release socket ownership
Lars Persson reported following deadlock :
-000 |M:0x0:0x802B6AF8(asm) <-- arch_spin_lock
-001 |tcp_v4_rcv(skb = 0x8BD527A0) <-- sk = 0x8BE6B2A0
-002 |ip_local_deliver_finish(skb = 0x8BD527A0)
-003 |__netif_receive_skb_core(skb = 0x8BD527A0, ?)
-004 |netif_receive_skb(skb = 0x8BD527A0)
-005 |elk_poll(napi = 0x8C770500, budget = 64)
-006 |net_rx_action(?)
-007 |__do_softirq()
-008 |do_softirq()
-009 |local_bh_enable()
-010 |tcp_rcv_established(sk = 0x8BE6B2A0, skb = 0x87D3A9E0, th = 0x814EBE14, ?)
-011 |tcp_v4_do_rcv(sk = 0x8BE6B2A0, skb = 0x87D3A9E0)
-012 |tcp_delack_timer_handler(sk = 0x8BE6B2A0)
-013 |tcp_release_cb(sk = 0x8BE6B2A0)
-014 |release_sock(sk = 0x8BE6B2A0)
-015 |tcp_sendmsg(?, sk = 0x8BE6B2A0, ?, ?)
-016 |sock_sendmsg(sock = 0x8518C4C0, msg = 0x87D8DAA8, size = 4096)
-017 |kernel_sendmsg(?, ?, ?, ?, size = 4096)
-018 |smb_send_kvec(server = 0x87C4D400, iov = 0x87D8DB10, n_vec = 1, sent = 0x87D8DB1C)
-019 |smb_send_rqst(server = 0x87C4D400, rqst = 0x87D8DBA0)
-020 |cifs_call_async(server = 0x87C4D400, rqst = 0x87D8DBA0, receive = 0x0, callback = 0x80219514,
-021 |cifs_async_writev(wdata = 0x87FD6580)
-022 |cifs_writepages(mapping = 0x852096E4, wbc = 0x87D8DC88)
-023 |__writeback_single_inode(inode = 0x852095D0, wbc = 0x87D8DC88)
-024 |writeback_sb_inodes(sb = 0x87D6D800, wb = 0x87E4A9C0, work = 0x87D8DD88)
-025 |__writeback_inodes_wb(wb = 0x87E4A9C0, work = 0x87D8DD88)
-026 |wb_writeback(wb = 0x87E4A9C0, work = 0x87D8DD88)
-027 |wb_do_writeback(wb = 0x87E4A9C0, force_wait = 0)
-028 |bdi_writeback_workfn(work = 0x87E4A9CC)
-029 |process_one_work(worker = 0x8B045880, work = 0x87E4A9CC)
-030 |worker_thread(__worker = 0x8B045880)
-031 |kthread(_create = 0x87CADD90)
-032 |ret_from_kernel_thread(asm)
Bug occurs because __tcp_checksum_complete_user() enables BH, assuming
it is running from softirq context.
Lars trace involved a NIC without RX checksum support but other points
are problematic as well, like the prequeue stuff.
Problem is triggered by a timer, that found socket being owned by user.
tcp_release_cb() should call tcp_write_timer_handler() or
tcp_delack_timer_handler() in the appropriate context :
BH disabled and socket lock held, but 'owned' field cleared,
as if they were running from timer handlers.
Fixes: 6f458dfb4092 ("tcp: improve latencies of timer triggered events")
Reported-by: Lars Persson <lars.persson@...s.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
include/net/sock.h | 5 +++++
net/core/sock.c | 5 ++++-
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 11 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 5c3f7c3624aa..2100d5e8809a 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1488,6 +1488,11 @@ static inline void sk_wmem_free_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
*/
#define sock_owned_by_user(sk) ((sk)->sk_lock.owned)
+static inline void sock_release_ownership(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ sk->sk_lock.owned = 0;
+}
+
/*
* Macro so as to not evaluate some arguments when
* lockdep is not enabled.
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 5b6a9431b017..c0fc6bdad1e3 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -2357,10 +2357,13 @@ void release_sock(struct sock *sk)
if (sk->sk_backlog.tail)
__release_sock(sk);
+ /* Warning : release_cb() might need to release sk ownership,
+ * ie call sock_release_ownership(sk) before us.
+ */
if (sk->sk_prot->release_cb)
sk->sk_prot->release_cb(sk);
- sk->sk_lock.owned = 0;
+ sock_release_ownership(sk);
if (waitqueue_active(&sk->sk_lock.wq))
wake_up(&sk->sk_lock.wq);
spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index f0eb4e337ec8..17a11e65e57f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -767,6 +767,17 @@ void tcp_release_cb(struct sock *sk)
if (flags & (1UL << TCP_TSQ_DEFERRED))
tcp_tsq_handler(sk);
+ /* Here begins the tricky part :
+ * We are called from release_sock() with :
+ * 1) BH disabled
+ * 2) sk_lock.slock spinlock held
+ * 3) socket owned by us (sk->sk_lock.owned == 1)
+ *
+ * But following code is meant to be called from BH handlers,
+ * so we should keep BH disabled, but early release socket ownership
+ */
+ sock_release_ownership(sk);
+
if (flags & (1UL << TCP_WRITE_TIMER_DEFERRED)) {
tcp_write_timer_handler(sk);
__sock_put(sk);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists