lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D0F6D3F7B@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date:	Thu, 6 Mar 2014 15:03:11 +0000
From:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:	'John Heffner' <johnwheffner@...il.com>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Can I limit the number of active tx per TCP socket?

From: John Heffner 
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 7:28 AM, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
> > Is it possible to stop a TCP connection having more than one
> > tx skb (in the ethernet tx ring) at any one time?
> > The idea is to allow time for short sends from the application
> > to accumulate so that the transmitted frames are longer.
>
> Is TCP_CORK what you're looking for?

No - TCP_CORK requires that you know you have more data to send.
In which case you are better off saving the system calls and
sending it with sendv() or writev().

I may well write the code to sit on the data for up to a ms
before sending it.  The data is sent out on a 64k line so
1ms is only 8 byte times.

	David



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ