[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140306.153835.2248996436618700806.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 15:38:35 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: amirv@...lanox.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, yevgenyp@...lanox.com,
ogerlitz@...lanox.com, prarit@...hat.com, gvaradar@...co.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V3 1/2] net: Utility function to get
affinity_hint by policy
From: Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 19:18:51 +0200
> + rxq %= num_online_cpus();
> +
> + p_numa_cores_mask = cpumask_of_node(numa_node);
> + if (!p_numa_cores_mask)
> + p_numa_cores_mask = cpu_online_mask;
> +
> + for_each_cpu(affinity_cpu, p_numa_cores_mask) {
> + if (--rxq < 0)
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&non_numa_cores_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + cpumask_xor(non_numa_cores_mask, cpu_online_mask, p_numa_cores_mask);
> +
> + for_each_cpu(affinity_cpu, non_numa_cores_mask) {
> + if (--rxq < 0)
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err;
The NUMA core mask and the non-NUMA core mask must together provide
at least num_online_cpus() bits.
Said another way, since rxq is limited to num_online_cpus() it should
never exceed local + non-local cores.
Therefore this -EINVAL path seems like it should not be possible, and
therefore perhaps a WARN_ON() or similar would be appropriate.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists