netdev - Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net/mlx4_core: mlx4_init_slave() shouldn't access comm channel before PF is ready

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140306.170927.196605336074788079.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 06 Mar 2014 17:09:27 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	or.gerlitz@...il.com
Cc:	ddutile@...hat.com, amirv@...lanox.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
	yevgenyp@...lanox.com, Narendra_K@...l.com,
	Sreekanth_Reddy@...l.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	andy@...yhouse.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net/mlx4_core: mlx4_init_slave() shouldn't
 access comm channel before PF is ready

From: Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 23:58:19 +0200

> So... we were thinking that there is a mechanism that causes them to
> retry that init as long as they return -EPROBE_DEFER or they succeed,
> isn't that the case?

Indeed.  When the PF returns from it's probe, all VFs that deferred
will retry.

Both patches applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html