netdev - Re: rfc: checkpatch logical line continuations (was IBM Akebono: Add support for a new PHY interface to the IBM emac driver)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1394234145.16156.109.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Fri, 07 Mar 2014 15:15:45 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	josh@...htriplett.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	alistair@...ple.id.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: rfc: checkpatch logical line continuations (was IBM Akebono:
 Add support for a new PHY interface to the IBM emac driver)

On Sat, 2014-03-08 at 02:04 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 01:30:17PM -0800, josh@...htriplett.org wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 01:02:44PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 15:41 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > > > From: Alistair Popple <alistair@...ple.id.au>
> > > > Date: Thu,  6 Mar 2014 14:52:25 +1100
> > > > 
> > > > > +	out_be32(dev->reg, in_be32(dev->reg) | WKUP_ETH_RGMIIEN
> > > > > +		 | WKUP_ETH_TX_OE | WKUP_ETH_RX_IE);
> > > > 
> > > > When an expression spans multiple lines, the lines should end with
> > > > operators rather than begin with them.
> > > 
> > > That's not in CodingStyle currently.
> > 
> > It's also not even remotely consistent across existing kernel code, and
> > it isn't obvious that there's a general developer consensus on the
> > "right" way to write it.
> > 
> 
> We just had this discussion in staging and Greg modified the patch to
> put the operator at the end.
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/25/125

I remember and it's the reason I bring it up in a
more public way.

> It's like logical && and || operators which go at the end these days.
> I don't really want to have a lot of checkpatch churn to convert
> everything...

Nor I really.  I simply would like a tool that lets
more core maintainers like David M avoid sending out
"do this, not that" type emails about patches.

I don't mind adding style checking that emits something
for patches and is quieter when scanning files.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html