[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaU3OCa1qDojcBK4Ci+YfOC7YfqLWqqBiwzh9vfEasH+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:58:51 +0800
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: "Gross, Mark" <mark.gross@...el.com>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Westerberg, Mika" <mika.westerberg@...el.com>,
"mgross@...ux.intel.com" <mgross@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: rfkill: gpio: remove gpio names
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Gross, Mark <mark.gross@...el.com> wrote:
> So if you have the luxury of being able to influence (file bugs against or write)
> the platform enumeration ABI then with ACPI you can have a named gpio today.
> Note: there is an expectation that the _PRP feature to go into the next version
> of ACPI and that should enable a trivial 1-1 mapping (when _prp is used by the
> ACPI platform) between the different platform enumeration API's (DT and ACPI).
Oh I wasn't aware. This makes things better, and gives con_id a clear usecase
in the ACPI probe path as well.
[Stephen]
>> If there were ever an (upstream?) ACPI "binding"(?) for the Tegra SDHCI
>> controller, I would hope it would use the exact same names for the GPIO
>> signals.
>
> me to!
Amen to that.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists