[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1394473516.3607.48.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:45:16 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jhs@...atatu.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [RCU PATCH 07/14] net: sched: RCU cls_route
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 10:06 -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> RCUify the route classifier. For now however spinlock's are used to
> protect fastmap cache.
>
> The issue here is the fastmap may be read by one CPU while the
> cache is being updated by another. An array of pointers could be
> one possible solution.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
> ---
> net/sched/cls_route.c | 217 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 124 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_route.c b/net/sched/cls_route.c
> index 1ad3068..cd0abba 100644
> --- a/net/sched/cls_route.c
> +++ b/net/sched/cls_route.c
> @@ -29,25 +29,26 @@
> * are mutually exclusive.
> * 3. "to TAG from ANY" has higher priority, than "to ANY from XXX"
> */
> -
> struct route4_fastmap {
> - struct route4_filter *filter;
> - u32 id;
> - int iif;
> + struct route4_filter *filter;
> + u32 id;
> + int iif;
> };
>
> struct route4_head {
> - struct route4_fastmap fastmap[16];
> - struct route4_bucket *table[256 + 1];
> + struct route4_fastmap fastmap[16];
> + struct route4_bucket __rcu *table[256 + 1];
> + struct rcu_head rcu;
> };
>
> struct route4_bucket {
> /* 16 FROM buckets + 16 IIF buckets + 1 wildcard bucket */
> - struct route4_filter *ht[16 + 16 + 1];
> + struct route4_filter __rcu *ht[16 + 16 + 1];
> + struct rcu_head rcu;
> };
>
> struct route4_filter {
> - struct route4_filter *next;
> + struct route4_filter __rcu *next;
> u32 id;
> int iif;
>
> @@ -55,6 +56,8 @@ struct route4_filter {
> struct tcf_exts exts;
> u32 handle;
> struct route4_bucket *bkt;
> + struct tcf_proto *tp;
> + struct rcu_head rcu;
> };
>
> #define ROUTE4_FAILURE ((struct route4_filter *)(-1L))
> @@ -64,14 +67,13 @@ static inline int route4_fastmap_hash(u32 id, int iif)
> return id & 0xF;
> }
>
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(fastmap_lock);
> static void
> -route4_reset_fastmap(struct Qdisc *q, struct route4_head *head, u32 id)
> +route4_reset_fastmap(struct route4_head *head)
> {
> - spinlock_t *root_lock = qdisc_root_sleeping_lock(q);
> -
> - spin_lock_bh(root_lock);
> + spin_lock(&fastmap_lock);
Dont you need spin_lock_bh() ?
> memset(head->fastmap, 0, sizeof(head->fastmap));
> - spin_unlock_bh(root_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&fastmap_lock);
> }
>
> static void
> @@ -80,9 +82,12 @@ route4_set_fastmap(struct route4_head *head, u32 id, int iif,
> {
> int h = route4_fastmap_hash(id, iif);
>
> + /* fastmap updates must look atomic to aling id, iff, filter */
> + spin_lock(&fastmap_lock);
same here
> head->fastmap[h].id = id;
> head->fastmap[h].iif = iif;
> head->fastmap[h].filter = f;
> + spin_unlock(&fastmap_lock);
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists