[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140311152029.GB29404@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 16:20:29 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: do not overwrite inetpeer metrics prematurely
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 04:08:14PM +0100, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> +static int fib6_commit_metrics(struct dst_entry *old_dst, struct dst_entry *dst,
> + struct nlattr *mx, int mx_len)
> +{
> + struct nlattr *nla;
> + int remaining;
> + u32 *mp;
> +
> + /* no new metrics and not inheriting an inetpeer with old ones */
> + if (!mx && (!(dst->flags & DST_HOST) || !old_dst ||
> + dst_metrics_read_only(old_dst)))
> + return 0;
> +
> + mp = dst_metrics_write_ptr(dst);
> + if ((dst->flags & DST_HOST) &&
> + old_dst && !dst_metrics_read_only(old_dst))
> + memset(mp, 0, RTAX_MAX * sizeof(u32));
> +
Small question:
Wouldn't make it easier if we move the kzalloc/dst_init_metrics part to
here in case we aren't a DST_HOST and remove it from ip6_route_add, too?
Otherwise (but really just a first look!), it seems ok to me.
Thanks,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists