[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1394509677.21721.4.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 20:47:57 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, mpm@...enic.com, satyam.sharma@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] bnx2: Call dev_kfree_skby_any instead of
dev_kfree_skb.
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 20:18 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Replace dev_kfree_skb with dev_kfree_skb_any in functions that can
> be called in hard irq and other contexts.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c
> index ca6b36220d94..c94735de808d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c
> @@ -2885,7 +2885,7 @@ bnx2_tx_int(struct bnx2 *bp, struct bnx2_napi *bnapi, int budget)
> sw_cons = BNX2_NEXT_TX_BD(sw_cons);
>
> tx_bytes += skb->len;
> - dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> + dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
This looks like a dev_consume_skb_any() candidate ?
Anyway, why can this be called from hard irq ?
I'll stop my review here, it seems either me or you are confused/tired.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists