[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5320C9FC.6070301@amacapital.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:56:28 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, tj@...nel.org
CC: ssorce@...hat.com, jkaluza@...hat.com, lpoetter@...hat.com,
kay@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2][V2] net: Implement SO_PEERCGROUP to get cgroup of
peer
On 03/12/2014 01:46 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is V2 of patches. Fixed the function format issue and also I was using
> CONFIG_CGROUP instead of CONFIG_CGROUPS. That led to crash at boot. Fixed that.
>
> Some applications like sssd want to know the cgroup of connected peer over
> unix stream socket. They want to use this information to map the cgroup to
> the container client belongs to and then decide what kind of policies apply
> on the container.
>
Can you explain what the use case is?
My a priori opinion is that this is a terrible idea. cgroups are a
nasty interface, and letting knowledge of cgroups leak into the programs
that live in the groups (as opposed to the cgroup manager) seems like a
huge mistake to me.
If you want to know where in the process hierarchy a message sender is,
add *that* and figure out how to fix the races (it shouldn't be that hard).
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists