netdev - Re: [PATCHv6 net-next 00/31] Misc. fixes for cxgb4 and iw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <C0E17A65-945A-4030-8D58-4DBD2076BCAC@chelsio.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:48:18 -0700
From:	Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	hariprasad@...lsio.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, roland@...estorage.com, dm@...lsio.com,
	swise@...ngridcomputing.com, santosh@...lsio.com,
	kumaras@...lsio.com, nirranjan@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 net-next 00/31] Misc. fixes for cxgb4 and iw_cxgb4

[[Sorry, the first effort at this reply fell afoul of netdev’s HTML email filter and my Mail Agent’s default modes. — Casey]]

On Mar 12, 2014, at 12:51 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> This is becomming beyond tiring.

  Im really sorry for how much work this has turned into David.  Hari is trying to do the right thing but it’s an insanely large patch set.  A while back someone recommended backing off and restarting with a series of much smaller patch sets.  I think the decision at that time was that too much time had gone into this patch set so Hari should proceed with the effort.  Should we revisit that decision and ask Hari to submit a series of much smaller patch sets (one at a time obviously)?

Casey--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html