[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1394819317.3253.3.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:48:37 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/10] e1000e: add timeout for TX HW time
stamping work
On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 18:34 +0100, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Hardware may fail to report time stamp e.g.:
> - when hardware time stamping is not enabled
> - when time stamp is requested shortly after ifup
trivia:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
[]
> @@ -1155,6 +1155,12 @@ static void e1000e_tx_hwtstamp_work(struct work_struct *work)
> skb_tstamp_tx(adapter->tx_hwtstamp_skb, &shhwtstamps);
> dev_kfree_skb_any(adapter->tx_hwtstamp_skb);
> adapter->tx_hwtstamp_skb = NULL;
> + } else if (time_after(jiffies, adapter->tx_hwtstamp_start
> + + adapter->tx_timeout_factor * HZ)) {
> + dev_kfree_skb_any(adapter->tx_hwtstamp_skb);
> + adapter->tx_hwtstamp_skb = NULL;
> + adapter->tx_hwtstamp_timeouts++;
> + e_warn("clearing Tx timestamp hang");
Missing \n termination
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists