[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.03.1403141020490.5976@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:24:42 +0100 (CET)
From: Enrico Mioso <mrkiko.rs@...il.com>
To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@....fi>
cc: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Enrico Mioso <mrkiko.rs@...il.com>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 0/3] The huawei_cdc_ncm driver / E3276
problem
I am sorry: no ideas on what to do next. Still, one idea would be to try
reverting these patches and see if it works with the original cdc_ncm driver,
and see what happens.
Other than this, I do not have this device at hand, so can't see what happens.
>From the version number, I expect the firmware being HiSilicon (not Qualcomm).
Try also using dhcpcd if you can / want / like :) .
Thank you.
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
==Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:05:25
==From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@....fi>
==To: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
==Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
== linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Enrico Mioso <mrkiko.rs@...il.com>,
== Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
==Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 0/3] The huawei_cdc_ncm driver / E3276 problem
==
==On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 09:58:43AM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
==> Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@....fi> writes:
==>
==> > ^NDISSTAT:1,,,"IPV4"
==> > ^RSSI: 21
==> >
==> > <I send: AT^DHCP?>
==> > ^DHCP: CCDB080A,F8FFFFFF,C9DB080A,C9DB080A,E67B59C0,E77B59C0,85600,85600
==>
==>
==> The hex numbers are IPv4 addresses in little endian. The decimal numbers
==> at the end are speed down/up IIRC.
==>
==> Printed in a more readable form, this is:
==>
==> 10.8.219.204,255.255.255.248,10.8.219.201,10.8.219.201,192.89.123.230,192.89.123.231,85600,85600
==>
==> I believe this is to be interpreted as
==>
==> yourip, netmask, gw, gw?, dns1, dns2
==>
==>
==> Do stuff work if you manually configure the interface with the
==> 10.8.219.204 address and set the default route to 10.8.219.201?
==>
==
==Unfortunately no :(
==
==# ifconfig wwp0s26u1u5i1
==wwp0s26u1u5i1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
== inet 10.8.219.204 netmask 255.255.255.248 broadcast 10.8.219.207
== inet6 fe80::e5b:8fff:fe27:9a64 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
== ether 0c:5b:8f:27:9a:64 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
== RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
== RX errors 1493 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
==
==Note the RX errors.. ?
==
== TX packets 53 bytes 532885 (520.3 KiB)
== TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
==
==# route -n
==Kernel IP routing table
==Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
==0.0.0.0 10.8.219.201 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 wwp0s26u1u5i1
==10.8.219.200 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 0 wwp0s26u1u5i1
==
==
==# ping 10.8.219.201
==PING 10.8.219.201 (10.8.219.201) 56(84) bytes of data.
==From 10.8.219.204 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable
==From 10.8.219.204 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
==From 10.8.219.204 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
==From 10.8.219.204 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable
==
==
==And pinging anywhere else doesn't work either.. (I also tried telnet/ssh/web - doesn't work).
==
==More ideas?
==
==
==> This is one way to rewrite the addresses if you need to for a new
==> connection:
==>
==> perl -e 'print join(".", reverse map {hex} unpack("(A2)*", shift)),"\n"' C9DB080A
==>
==
==This is handy, thanks!
==
==>
==>
==> Bjørn
==>
==
==
==
==-- Pasi
==
==
Powered by blists - more mailing lists